.

City Council Tells Community 'To Ayres Is Divine'

Fountain Valley council members unanimously approve a resolution that would bring a four-story hotel and 88 single-family and town homes to the former SafeCo building despite outcries from local residents.

A standing-room only crowd of more than 200 Fountain Valley residents packed the Council Chambers on Tuesday evening to make a final plea to the City Council. They implored council members to halt the Civic Center Specific Plan project, which would bring a 124-room, four-story Ayres Hotel, 88 residential homes and 2,300 square feet of retail/storage space to an 8.62 acre parcel at Brookhurst St. and Slater Ave., where the former SafeCo building is located.

Twenty-two citizens, mostly from the neighborhood to the south and southeast of the proposed site, spoke passionately at the public hearing. There were long-time residents like Doris Flynn, who has lived there since 1969, and Tom Slauss, a 35-year resident on Los Alamos St. There was a work-from-home father, the queen of Fountain Valley real estate, a pair of librarians and even a member of the Fountain Valley Historical Society.

But despite their outpouring of emotion and disbelief, the City Council moved quickly and decisively. After a few cursory questions, they unanimously approved the plan by the Costa Mesa-based Olson Company and Ayres Hotel that has undergone more than 25 revisions in 18 months. The vote was 4-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mark McCurdy abstaining because he lives within 500 feet of the zoning area.

“The fact that we have had nothing to replace SafeCo for a number of years, and we continue to have this empty property lying around, and the fact that Ayres and Olson have come to us with this information, I think we can work with them,” said Councilman Larry Crandall. “I am very supportive of this. I hope the residents understand the process and learn to like this as I did with the Orange Coast (Memorial Medical Center) project.”

Council member Steve Nagel also said he was tired of seeing the former SafeCo site dormant for the last seven years and pointed to the potential economic development that a new hotel could bring to Fountain Valley.

“I get comments all the time from area residents wanting to know what’s going to happen with the SafeCo building. I think we have something that we will be able to be proud of,” Nagel said. “We have a sports park … with a lot of youth teams coming to this city, and we will have a location in this city along with the other hotels in town that they will be able to stay in this town, spend their money in this town at our businesses.”

And Mayor John Collins said that traffic seemed to be the community’s biggest concern, but that if the SafeCo and Coastline Community College buildings were occupied today, they would generate 1,988 more vehicle trips that the proposed project.

“I think the analysis could be off a little bit, but that is still double what the master plan said and what the project has shown today,” Collins said. “Traffic is larger and larger in our city as things happen, but the traffic of that density will be less,” because vehicles are not arriving at 8 a.m. and leaving at 5 p.m. “I think it’s a good project and it’s back far enough so people won’t be looking in your pool or backyard.”

The Olson Company has met with the community 17 times, seven times in large groups and other times in smaller groups, to listen to residents and come up with a master plan that would adequately addresses most of their concerns, including increasing traffic and lack of parking. Olson Senior Vice President John Reekstin said the final plan, which was downsized from 100 residential homes, makes better sense for the community.

“I think it fulfills a lot of goals,” Reekstin said. “The hotel will be beneficial to the city and I think from a land-planning perspective it’s a logical use of the land at a very busy intersection. I know that will fill a niche in the community.”

Don Ayres, vice president of operations for Ayres Hotel, said he was pleased with the council’s swift vote but also understood the concerns of the community. In fact, he said after attending a few of the recent city planning hearings he began to question whether hotel No. 21 in the chain would be a good idea for the Fountain Valley community.

“I think whenever you’re doing a project like this you are going back and forth,” Ayres said. “But you think more that it’s going to happen than not. We are confident now that working beside The Olson Company, which is an outstanding company with their work ethic and integrity, it's going to be a good partnership. Fountain Valley will be proud that they have an Ayres Hotel, and we’re proud to be part of the community.”

The only tense moment during the 2½-hour hearing came when Councilman Crandall, the first to speak after the public's comments, was booed resoundingly by the crowd after saying, “I don’t think the residents fully understand how much work has gone into this project.” Crandall sarcastically thanked the crowd, adding that the outburst was “very offensive to me,” and “that just solidifies some of the other things I’d like to do.”

The Olson Company plans to begin demolition of the existing buildings by the early part of May, and then start grading activities, with the start of vertical construction beginning sometime this summer. The 27 single-family, two-story homes and 61 two-story and three-story townhomes will take at least a couple years to be completed.

Reekstin said the residential homes will be known as, “Solano Walk.”

Jana Beekman, project manager for Ayres, said the four-story, 124-room hotel will take 12-16 months to be completed once the SafeCo building has been demolished.

“We are very excited and happy to be coming to Fountain Valley,” Beekman said. “The Ayres know how to build hotels and what works well in a community. We are excited to move forward and hopefully start construction this summer.”

Joker Joe March 07, 2012 at 04:14 PM
Citizens be damn!! Just like I indicated months ago. Mayor John Collins approves the plan because traffic from the hotel and homes will be half of what traffic from a commercial center would be. This guy doesn't seem cognizant that traffic is now zero compared with the plan. In business we have a saying..FOLLOW THE MONEY. Who is being rewarded under the table to go against the community? We elected them. Remember we can un elect them.
Dennis Antenucci March 07, 2012 at 07:28 PM
You mean like re-call them? Where is the petition?
Joker Joe March 07, 2012 at 07:43 PM
I personally mean don't elect them again.
Doris Flinn March 07, 2012 at 11:30 PM
It was quite disturbing and disappointing that Councilman Crandall struck out at the 200 people that were there when a few in the audience booed. I think they were expressing that we thought the city council was working for the people of Fountain Valley and not the Olson Company. And, yes, we do know how much work the Olson Company did. We just didn't feel their project was the right fit for the property. Too bad the council didn't at least listen to their citizens and discuss their comments before taking a vote. It made us all feel like their decision had been made way before last night.
Rick Case March 07, 2012 at 11:54 PM
It will be interesting to see how our officials react when the new residents start cutting thru the local neighborhood. Perhaps some of their new found $$ can be used to widen the neighborhood streets and install traffic signals.
Marilynn Manderscheid March 08, 2012 at 01:32 AM
I agree completely, Doris. With all the exposure lately of corrupt city governments, I begin to question the integrity of ours. How disappointing, after having lived here 43 years, to see the people we elected ignore our voices. We will have to speak clearly at the next election.
Joker Joe March 08, 2012 at 04:09 PM
This project will be years in the making and construction will limit the lanes and foul up traffic long before the site starts fouling it up. Thanks for the boondoggle FV city council....Will see you at the polls. signed.. the little people
Melissa Pete March 08, 2012 at 06:05 PM
I'm disappointed, but not surprised. It appears this decision was made before the council members came to the meeting. Does anyone ever say, "Wait, let's see what the community wants?" Nope. The system is set up such that it appears to give the community a voice in what happens, but it's a farce. Mr. Crandall's response is proof that we are expected to let the council make decisions they think are best and keep quiet when we don't approve. The same type of behavior occurred at the FV School Board meetings in response to the parents who were upset and spoke out. It's true that we have power when it comes to elections, but I have little hope that we will have candidates that won't be pulled by the entrenched system.
Dennis Antenucci March 08, 2012 at 06:07 PM
It will be interesting to track Crandall and the other City Council members career paths. One thing is clear and that is they have no future in Fountain Valley as elected officials. Yea, follow the money.
Carol Hakala March 09, 2012 at 02:19 AM
This isn't new behavior on the part of our city officials. The "Good Old Boy Network" has been running rampant for years. Their minds were made up before they passed the motorhome issue in our community, as well as when they created a two-tier water billing program in our City, which directly penalizes single family residents. The City of Fountain Valley has needed to clean house for years. Let's just hope that its citizens don't forget before the next election. I was glad to see we had gained two new members as a result of the last election. Unfortunately, one of these new councilmen just goes with the flow and little has changed. Sure they hold hearings, not to listen and take the voices of their citizens seriously, but to merely placate. After living in this City for 43 years, I have become disgusted with many of the behind door decisions made, regardless of what the citizens want or think. Fountain Valley used to be a nice place to live.
Jim Weil March 09, 2012 at 02:40 AM
I agree with Dennis - follow the money! I was disappointed that no council member asked the engineer who did the traffic analysis why he did not disclose whether or not he has done work for the Olson Co. in the past. His smug and condescending dismissal of the challenges to his traffic study didn't sit right with the good citizens attending the last Planning Commission meeting. This was in spite of repeating "I work you YOU!" several times. I don't think many of us bought that.statement. Traffic is bad now, and will only get WORSE when this project is fully populated. We did not have a parking problem when Safeco was in business, and traffic was only affected twice a weekday. Now we will have parking and traffic issues 24/7.
Morpheus August 22, 2012 at 10:12 PM
Yup, Crandall not re-running and he shouldn't. He was so insulting to our intelligence at the last city council meeting where all the council members voted to approve the Olson project. Any council member who is not thick skinned doesn't belong on the city council. He should have understood the protest by the Fountain Valley residents at that last meeting which were civil protests.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something