.

Kromer: Higher Pension Rate for New Fire Chief Likely Off the Table

The proposed increase was an attempt to expedite the hiring process, but now appears to be unnecessary.

Fountain Valley appears to be close to getting its new fire chief, and the controversial proposal to provide that new chief with a higher pension rate will now likely not be necessary, City Manager Ray Kromer said Thursday.

Kromer said the city's preferred candidate, whose name hasn't yet been released, is undergoing a background check and is in the final stages of the hiring process. But, Kromer said, the city hit a snag with California Public Employees Retirement System, which did not want to accept the city's new rate of 2 percent at 50 years of age. In an attempt to get around that issue and speed up the hiring process, the city was willing to revert to its old rate of 3 percent.

"I was trying to bring this person on faster than what the state pension board was moving," Kromer said. "What they were doing was taking us round and round; they've been screwing around with us for four months...We've been fooling around with CalPERS since October, and it seemed like there was no end in sight. I haven't had a fire chief since May."

A decision on the proposed pension rate for the city's new fire chief was postponed Tuesday night by the city council. Local resident Jeannie Gallindo spoke out against the proposal during the council meeting, and Roy Reynolds wrote about it in a Fountain Valley Patch . Kromer said the city had a breakthrough Wednesday with CalPERS, and that an agreement should be reached by early next week.

"Right now, it looks like this is gonna click," Kromer said. "I was just trying to get the process moving, and just taking [the higher pension rate] as an option. But if we ever made headway with CalPERS, then we could go back. Now it looks like we won't need that option."


Joker Joe January 20, 2012 at 04:52 PM
Are you saying we have not had a fire chief since May? How did we get along with out one since then? What could we do with the 1/4 million plus saved in salary and benefits?. You let the union bully you & decide the rate should be 3% instead of 2%? City Manager Ray Kromer. Will remember you come election time. Inquisitive minds need to know!!
Justin Petruccelli January 20, 2012 at 07:53 PM
The city had a very capable interim chief until December, and I don't think the city was necessarily bullied into anything; more of a case where they were trying to cut through the red tape with the state's pension board. Like the story said, it's more than likely a moot point now anyway.
Carol Hakala April 16, 2012 at 11:14 PM
Typical - our City employees trying to "cut through the red tape" by generously increasing the retirement rate by 1% with taxpayer money. Would Mr. Kromer be so generous if the amount from coming out of his pocket, personally? Got to love our generous City officials!! NOT...

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something