San Onofre Nuke Plant Fight Moves to State Level

The factions warring over whether to restart the beleaguered San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station take their battle before the California Public Utilities Commission.

Business groups and anti-nuclear activists squared off before a judge and commissioner from the California Public Utilities Commission Thursday over whether Southern California Edison can charge customers for costs related to its embattled San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

The forum is the latest in dozens of governmental hearings and meetings that over the past year that have spanned local, state and federal agencies. A January 2012 steam leak shuttered the plant and revealed thousands of faulty components -- problems related to design flaws in the plant's newly installed steam generators. Adding to the company’s troubles, a Massachusetts Congressman called on the Security and Exchange Commission Thursday to investigate whether Edison violated federal securities laws by withholding from investors information on the faulty steam generators.

The massive fight over the engineering failure and the safety and economic concerns surrounding the plant continued at the Costa Mesa Community Center Thursday.

Warring Factions

Business groups and organizations like the Orange County Business Council, Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce and Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce lined up in support of the partial and speedy restart of the plant as proposed by Edison. The plan is currently under review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, but no federal decision is expected until the end of April.

"Orange County enjoys some of the lowest unemployment in the state," said Bryan Starr, and executive with the Orange County Business Council. "If not SONGS, then what? What are the alternative sources of energy that could power our businesses immediately? Broad statements about alternative power aren't going to cut it."

Those fighting for a permanent shutdown of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station include activists from organizations like San Clemente Green, San Diego's Citizens Oversight Committee and the national Friends of the Earth group.

Safety and health concerns have dominated the anti-nuclear activists' public message to-date, but the individual groups have organized together and adapted their protests to focus on financial problems for the benefit of the CPUC hearings. Signs in the hearing audience read, "Cut our losses; not a penny more to Edison."

Grace VanThillo, a San Clemente resident demanded her money back.

"We ratepayers should not be paying hundreds of millions of dollars for Edison's mistakes," she said. "In fact, the ratepayers deserve hundreds of millions of dollars in refunds for Edison's mistakes we've already paid for."

Ratepayer advocate organizations like The Utility Reform Network are calling for refunds to ratepayers, who continue to pay for upkeep and replacement power purchasing for the shuttered plant.

"The Utility Reform Network stands for affordable bills and accountable utilities," said group spokeswoman Mindy Spatt. "That means accountable for their mistakes, and Edison made a colossal one. If Edison's steam tubes are faulty, then that's Edison's problem. Customers should not have to pay a single penny for costs incurred for an inoperable nuclear plant."

A Utility Reform Network press release states that Edison has collected $115 million from ratepayers since 2010 when the last of four new steam generators were installed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, "$46 million of which went to shareholder profits."

Local elected officials have split on the issue. Some city councils have adopted resolutions expressing grave concerns about the continued operation of the plant, such as the city of Del Mar and the San Diego Unified School District Board. Others, like the mayor of Newport Beach Kieth Curry and Fountain Valley Councilman Steve Nagel spoke in favor of a plan to reopen the plant.

Edison and Regulators Under Fire

The process to decide whether Edison owes customer refunds will likely take months, CPUC officials say. In the meantime, Mitsubishi, who nuclear inspectors determined made major design mistakes in constructing the faulty generators, has paid Edison back $45.5 million in connection with a product warranty, according to the Orange County Register.

It's likely, however, that Mitsubishi and Edison will be engaged in further financial wrangling as events at the plant develop.

Also on Thursday, U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., sent an open letter to the chairman of the Security and Exchange Commission, calling for an investigation into whether Edison hid vital information about the installation of the steam generators from shareholders.

Markey teamed up with U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. earlier this month to reveal information from internal Edison documents, which prove Edison knowingly installed the faulty generators, they allege.

And the CPUC itself hasn't escaped recent public criticism: the California Legislative Analyst raised concerns about the agency's budgetary practices. Though only tangentially related to the oversight of San Onofre, the office raised concerns about how the CPUC is overseeing accounts of utilities like Edison, given they appear to be mismanaging hundreds of millions of ratepayer fees within their own agency, KPBS reported Friday.

The CPUC will hold another set of public input hearings in San Diego.

San Juan February 27, 2013 at 04:17 PM
B D, The cost of Nuclear power in comparrison to solar or wind or oean "plungers" has got to be substantially cheaper if you look at the cost of erection, maintenance and management. I have "first hand knowledge" of the waste of our dollars by operating and maintaining SONGS. Closing songs is not "fear based" as you say. It is from "first hand experience and knowledge". I'm not sure if you know anything about the site, but if you do, then you can substaniate the massive amount of procedures that must be adhered to, let's just start with these, Fire Permits, opening and closing manways, confined space requirements, rigging (light and heavy), making lifts over critical plant equipment, welding, oxy acetelyne use, Health Physics requirements, man lifts, Radioactive Material Transport, Radioactive Material Handling, Radioactive Materials Storage, Greater than Class C Materials Storage, driving on site, ladder use, scaffold erection, Oh my goodness there are literally books of procedures that are so redundant in nature that it takes sometimes hours to accomplish a very simple task.
San Juan February 27, 2013 at 04:27 PM
B D, let me finish, Let me say this about "fear based" concernes, I was on a job for Unit 1 at SONGS in the early 80's where I witnessed a very high ranking individual telling a "concerned" worker to "screw a lightbulb up your a%% if your so concerned about radiation, if it lights up, get out of the hole". This is typical of SONGS management. What the worker was asking about was what were dealing with today,the current Steam Generators. His question was, If the Primary side of things go south and enters the Secondary System, which is in direct contact with ocean cooling water via condenser tubes that are always spring leaks, will it contaminate the Condensers, the outfall pipe and the ocean? When I heard the Supervisors comment I quit and about 10 others did as well.
San Juan February 27, 2013 at 04:36 PM
Still not done, were restricted to 1500 letters. I have lived in the area before the Dana Point Harbor was built and have had no desire to live anywhere else including, Columbia or Argentina and I can only imagine what would happen there without power, thus thats why I live here. Imagine you have a beautiful 8 cylinder engine, and your planning a trip to Columbia. But you realise that water has made it's way into the crankcase, or it's only running on 5 of them 8 cylinders. Your thinking to yourself, if I only run the vehicle at about 70% of it's designed power I might make it ...to Oceanside. Shut er down, let the Labor market DEMO it for the next 15 to 20 years and boost the economy for hundreds of employees and we can move on. Whew, got that off my chest!
CaptD March 02, 2013 at 01:13 AM
Judge Orders Edison To Show San Onofre Cost Is Reasonable http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/feb/22/judge-orders-southern-california-edison-show-gener/#c18368
Constance Calum October 16, 2013 at 10:04 PM
So amazing that a desalination plant is coming to San Onofre. Jobs guaranteed if the water tests pure to Scripps. No dumps or leaks and guaranteed jobs for that team. Yeah!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »